Next: Conclusion
Up: ORBIT CONTROL AT THE
Previous: FOFB Implementation
Up to now, the digital BPM/FOFB system and the corrector magnet system
have been located in two different VME crates. This approach allowed
an independent commissioning of two newly developed systems. Since the
operation of the SOFB has already fulfilled the requirements of the
experiments for the time being, low priority has been given to the
implementation of the FOFB. On the other hand,
operation of the SLS during the last couple of months has shown the
importance of an ``intelligent'' BPM system which is capable of self
diagnosing hardware faults. This is an important requirement for a
reliable operation of the feedback system. Therefore emphasis has been
put on sophisticated low level software in order to detect BPMs with
spurious bad readings. When the feedback loop is closed the residual
orbit fluctuations are typically in the order of
m. If both rms
values of
and
taken over the last 64 orbit samples exceed a
predefined threshold an operator alarm is raised and the DSP software
disables the possibly faulty BPM. Since the orbit feedback monitors
the on-line status of all BPMs it automatically recalculates the
inverse response matrix of the remaining set of BPMs and correctors
and continues operation automatically. The next step in the
implementation of the FOFB system is to shift the functionality of the
SOFB from the central beam dynamics PC down to the DSP level and
operate the feedback with initially 3 Hz before switching to the full
sample rate of 4 kHz.
Figure 5:
Hardware layout of the FOFB in one of the twelve sectors
|
Next: Conclusion
Up: ORBIT CONTROL AT THE
Previous: FOFB Implementation
Michael Boege
2002-06-19