next up previous
Next: Evaluation of the acceptance Up: Simulation of the injection Previous: Injection with roll angle

Injection in a realistic case

The last scenario to consider is a realistic one, were we include the following elements:

Again, figures 18 to 23 shows the result of the simulation. The beam is still safely injected in the machine. The main difference in this case is a large betatron oscillation in the vertical plane, due to the off-axis injection, but the particles remain inside the vacuum chamber.


  
Figure 18: Bumped orbit for the realistic case.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\mbox{\epsfig{figure=s_bump.eps, width=.95\textwidth} }
\end{center}\end{figure}


  
Figure 19: Horizontal orbit of the injected particle for the firsts 5 turns for the realistic case.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\mbox{\epsfig{figure=s_injected.eps, width=.95\textwidth} }
\end{center}\end{figure}


  
Figure 20: Vertical orbit of the injected particle for the firsts 5 turns for the realistic case.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\mbox{\epsfig{figure=s_injected_y.eps, width=.95\textwidth} }
\end{center}\end{figure}


  
Figure 21: Evolution of the injected beam ellipse at the exit of the septum, for the realistic case.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\leavevmode
\mbox{\epsfig{figure=s_ellipse.eps, width=.95\textwidth} }
\end{center}\end{figure}


  
Figure 22: Evolution of the injected beam in the horizontal phase space for a damping time, for the realistic case.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\leavevmode \mbox{\epsfig{figure=s_phase.eps,
width=.95\textwidth} }
\end{center}\end{figure}


  
Figure 23: Evolution of the injected beam in the vertical phase space for a damping time, for the realistic case.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\leavevmode
\mbox{\epsfig{figure=s_phase_y.eps, width=.95\textwidth} }
\end{center}\end{figure}


next up previous
Next: Evaluation of the acceptance Up: Simulation of the injection Previous: Injection with roll angle
Marc Munoz
1999-10-13