Next: MODEL PARAMETERS
 Up: BEAM LIFETIME STUDIES FOR
 Previous: BEAM LIFETIME STUDIES FOR
Touschek lifetime is approximately1 
given as function of  momentum acceptance (MA) and bunch volume
integrated over the lattice structure [6,12].
While the RF MA is given by the cavity voltage and almost constant
along the lattice, the lattice MA depends on where the scattering
event occurred and varies along the lattice. In particular we
have to distinguish between
- non-dispersive sections, where a
scattered particle will just follow the dispersive orbit, and 
local MA is determined by the momentum range of closed orbit 
existence or physical aperture, and
 - dispersive sections, where a scattered particle will start 
an oscillation around the dispersive orbit, and local MA may be determined
by dynamic aperture or by mismatch of dynamic to physical aperture.
 
Usual calculations [13] assume a perfectly linear and chromaticity corrected
lattice and obtain the local MA from
  | 
(1) | 
 
with 
,
Ho the lattice invariant (dispersion's emittance) 
at scattering location 
and 
horizontal 
beta function, dispersion and vacuum chamber half width at other lattice locations.
In modern light sources, designed for lowest emittance (at limited circumference),
strong sextupoles for correction of large chromaticities generated by the required 
focusing, introduce significant nonlinearities into the lattice that have to
be considered in MA calculations:
- Momentum dependency of linear optics parameters: 
Calculations on light source
lattices optimized for large MA [1] have to consider
momentum deviations up to 
10%. Within this wide range the  
chromatic resonance drive terms from the sextupoles'
Hamiltonian cause momentum dependent beta beats and second 
order chromaticities [2].
 - Nonlinear variation of closed orbit with momentum, i.e. higher order dispersion
as included earlier in calculations at SOLEIL [11].
 - Nonlinear betatron motion: Momentum dependent dynamic apertures smaller than 
the physical apertures or distortions of the transverse eigenfigures and mismatch to the
physical apertures as illustrated in Fig. 1 lead to a reduction of local MA.
 - Synchrotron oscillation: Due to higher order chromaticity scattered particles 
walk over wide regions in the tune diagram crossing several betatron resonances. 
Hence we observe a significant reduction of MA when including synchrotron oscillations
compared to fixed-
calculations.
 - Magnet alignment errors: Touschek lifetime depends on the emittance coupling factor
.
Including alignment errors generating
nonzero 
in a flat lattice is required to predict numbers for 
average lifetime and its variation for different error distributions (''seeds'').
 - Mini gap insertions: The beam halo has larger coupling than the beam core, as observed
for example at ESRF [10], since
large amplitude particles from scattering suffer more from higher order coupling resonances.
For the performance of light sources using undulators with full gap heights as small as
4 mm it is essential to know how this affects the lifetime.
 
  
Figure 1:
Nonlinear betatron motion: A Touschek scattered particle
starting to oscillate around the off-momentum orbit 
would be accepted by the linear separatrix (ellipse) 
but not by the nonlinear separatrix. 
  | 
 
In order to include all these effects from the Touschek lifetime point of view we take a 
brute force approach by starting particles from the beam core with some momentum deviation, i.e
with the 6D initial vector 
as it will
be immediately after a Touschek scattering event [12].
Tracking  and binary search for the maximum accepted 
gives the local MA.
The resulting stepwise function of lattice MA 
then is entered into the
Touschek integral. If misalignments are to be included the calculation is repeated for a 
number of random seeds. This procedure was implemented into the program TRACY [5]. 
 
 
   
 Next: MODEL PARAMETERS
 Up: BEAM LIFETIME STUDIES FOR
 Previous: BEAM LIFETIME STUDIES FOR
Andreas Streun
1999-06-07